So this podcaster should probably let people know why he spent a year not issuing new episodes. The truth is that he doesn't really know. He struggled with whether to keep the podcast going through the year, he then tried writing a blog which ultimately became something of a column in the Times of Israel, and all of the articles from there can still be found in perpetuity. Just search for his name on the website of the newspaper. Two of the articles even got a wide international circulation, but along of course with the greater attention comes all the brutality of the comment section, a place where nobody chimes in to tell you what a good job you're doing. And, the biggest of course of all, along with that brief period of pyrrhic glory he had all manner of his usual ferociously bestial struggles with his unremittingly troubled mental health.
But I suppose the ultimate problem was that the topics he wanted to cover were simply too big to be covered in any half-hour. With every passing week he would get a new grand idea - a series on American literature, a series on Orson Welles, a series on Goethe... but it all kept falling on the same problem: it was just too much work, too much organization, too many dots to connect over too wide a space for a mind that has always worked piecemeal from the fire of spontaneous combustion, or to put it succinctly - too much concentration. The disciplined organization required in such large scale projects are... shall we use a euphemism here... beyond his pay grade.
This podcaster is not any real intellectual, just an intellectual striver, perhaps even a pseudo intellectual, who perhaps fancies himself gripped by unremitting curiousity, but who pursues his questions by reading little more than a few dozen pages at a time, all too rarely finishing any book, before he embarks upon the next of the thousand books in his apartment or the couple hundred books he's begun listening to online. The fox knows many little things, while the hedgehog knows one big thing - or so this podcaster read Isaiah Berlin write that Aesop once wrote... he still hasn't checked the original Aesop for himself.... If that's the case, then this podcaster is a hyper-fox - perhaps a jackal or a dingo or a dhole; the living, embodied proof that Attention Deficit Disorder truly exists, that condition of which, when he was a child, it was so fashionable to deny its existence, and yet was almost inevitably a telltale indicator in my generation of larger problems to come when the child reached adolescence and adulthood.
This podcaster desires little more in life than for his impulsive mind to assert autonomy over itself, but as the years go on, the difficulty of such a task seems even more difficult now than it ever did when he was younger. Perhaps he must content himself with the idea that if a troubling thought emerges in his brain, he can trust his natural distractibility will eventually make it go away. And yet, perhaps the reason disturbing thoughts do not leave him is that his natural distractibility is not truly a lack of focus, but is in fact a deeper kind of hyper-focus on those subjects which dictate terms to a mind that simultaneously possesses a bottomless capacity for distractibility yet also a bottomless capacity for obsession?
Perhaps, when the Ritalin generation incurred its first mass-diagnosis, older generations had such trouble believing in the existence of so widespread a condition as Attention Deficit Disorder because the conditions in which brains of their generations formed themselves were so different from our conditions... Perhaps ADD is like depression or diabetes, a condition that once contracted, is lifelong, and requires perpetual management. And perhaps, like with depression, Attention Deficit Disorder requires a trigger, a primary cause that tips a person who already had a genetic predisposition to something like these problems. And in an era of cable television and nascent gaming culture, the capacity for distraction was dozens of times stronger than it was for a generation who grew up on televisions that picked up only three channels. How much more so infinite is the capacity for distractibility in the era of the internet and online gaming?
...duality/paradox of parenting discipline, can cause - the benefits and liabilities of stricter parenting.
...further elaboration of duality/paradox of distractibility being both lack of focus and hyper focus.
Monday, July 1, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I wonder if hyper focus is the mind developing a defense mechanism whereby it latches onto a task with every exertion because there is a history of all other, less severe attempts failing, like a drowning man who cannot swim, but rather than loosely cling to the lifeguard, nearly drowns him as well from the zeal of the cling.
ReplyDelete