“And
then there’s the still more amazing Glagolitic Mass - described by Milan Kundera as 'more an orgy than a mass.' It’s just the plain Church Mass which
so many Christian denominations use to this day, but it’s in Old Church
Slavonic rather than Latin or Greek or Russian. Oddly, the Agnus Dei (Lamb of
God) section is missing, with its invocation ‘Dona Nobis Pacem’ (Give us
peace). It’s fruitless to speculate, but my guess is that Janacek did this
deliberately, and substituted in its place a war cry. Specifically a war cry played by the Organ, to sound a note of defiance for the
Czech people who had been under Austro-German subjugation for so many centuries
(and would soon be again).”
(The Agnus Dei of Janacek’s Glagolitic Mass.)
The evidence on this blog keeps piling up that I’m either a
fraud or going senile. I’d hope that anyone who knows me well enough would
think it more likely to be the latter. The Glagolitic Mass is a piece I could
probably write out in full score with reasonably impressive accuracy (both in
original and revised versions – just don’t expect me to remember the text…). And
yet I’d written that there’s no Agnus Dei section. No doubt, any number of
experts would read that statement and conclude that I know absolutely nothing about
Janacek…perhaps I don’t if I make a mistake that obvious. But if that’s the
case with a composer I love as much as Janacek, then there’s probably no hope
for me to opine reliably on any other subject either. Perhaps my memory for facts
and figures is going the way of my memory for everything else, aka arguably
non-existent. As my brother Ethan reminded me last night, I seem to remember any
fact I’ve been told once over my lifetime, yet I seem to be locked out of my
apartment once every three days.
I’d like to think that this is the single worst
transgression against easily confirmable facts which I’ve ever committed on
this blog. But I know myself too well to ever believe that. During the last
couple weeks I referred to Walther Rathenau as Walter von Rathenau, I claimed
that life under British Imperialism was easily the most tolerable of all imperial
rules because I’d forgotten about the French ‘mission civilisatrice’ which allowed
imperial subjects to become French citizens and even stand for Parliament; I
entitled a post ‘Culture
of Offense’ after I’d devoted an entire
jeremiad on this blog to the misuse of the term ‘culture’ as a way to
describe anything people dislike about other people. But the single worst mistake was when
I wrote an entire post about Istanbul, or 'Istambul' as I spelled it...for the entirety of the post. I'd even visited Istanbul (for a day) when I was 17. I genuinely didn’t realize the mistake I’d made until Der Koosh pointed it out to me, at which
point I truly didn’t believe him until I googled the city, and then realized that
I’d been spelling it wrong my whole life.
This particular mistake only occurred to me yesterday as I
was biking, alone with my thoughts and the good weather. In a fit of dread, I nearly doubled back
to my apartment correct the error the moment I realized it. And then I thought… why bother? The
damage is done; just another in my series of easily correctable mistakes, most
of which I probably haven’t yet noticed.
Fortunately, very few people regularly read this blog. If
they did, I’d have long since been discredited as a credible source for just
about anything – and that’s precisely why it stings so badly when I’ve been blamed
for things I know I’d done correctly. During the extremely brief period I was a
fourth-string music critic for the Washington Post, I apparently got the facts
wrong on the price of a ticket – and the ticket price was the crux of my entire
review. But there remains another fact that I’d found three separate websites which
listed the ticket price I listed (one of which changed the listed ticket price for
the group’s concert a mere hour after I called to inquire, thereby sabotaging
my claim to the Post editors). Meanwhile, my old editor at our college webzine is
a rising star at the Washington Post. He recently did a profile about the
likely next Senator from Maine, Angus King. He referred to King as a thoroughly
independent-minded politician in the tradition of such other iconoclastic Maine
politicians as Olympia Snowe, Margaret Chase Smith, and George Mitchell…George
Mitchell was a Senate Democratic Majority Leader. When George HW Bush tried
to paint Bill Clinton as another ‘tax-and-spend liberal’, it was George
Mitchell (along with Ted Kennedy) to whom he most liked to compare Clinton.
I’m a family business factotum; he’s a star at the Washington Post. Life isn’t fair, and people who are far worse off than I could complain with much more authenticity than I can.
So what can I possibly say in my defense except that like any writer entertaining enough to be worth reading, I’m wrong at least as often as I’m right? Like any blogger, the onanistic pleasure of bloviating to the wind is but a click of a mouse away. Who needs facts when you have opinions? I don’t claim to be smarter than everyone else, just that I try to be J.
I’m a family business factotum; he’s a star at the Washington Post. Life isn’t fair, and people who are far worse off than I could complain with much more authenticity than I can.
So what can I possibly say in my defense except that like any writer entertaining enough to be worth reading, I’m wrong at least as often as I’m right? Like any blogger, the onanistic pleasure of bloviating to the wind is but a click of a mouse away. Who needs facts when you have opinions? I don’t claim to be smarter than everyone else, just that I try to be J.
I'm just glad that you didn't take my spelling correction as an excuse to pull a Jed Bartlett and crash into a tree.
ReplyDeleteAre we mixing two different West Wing plots?
ReplyDelete